Comments for Tech Review - TruXter

Comment on Tiny 7 Users – You need to know by R-Truth

R-Truth — Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:04:51 +0000

And I quote the latest post from Exper1ence is after the so called claims of his death.
————————————

Trusted eXPer1ence at 2011-10-24 00:12 CET:

Yeah it will support multi boot with XP. You should install XP first on one partition then Windows 7 on another. Once Windows 7 is installed, use “EasyBCD” (its free) to manage the two OS’s. I just have mine set on a 5 second timeout and XP to boot as default with Windows 7 the second choice. EasyBCD lets you change the boot order. I would run 7 but I have an old setup. I actually run Server 2003 most of the time, get on that if you haven’t tried it yet, its faster than all other versions including 7/XP.

Comment on What Gaming Platforms Will See GTA V by XDPPX

XDPPX — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:26:31 +0000

They wont put it on wii because there junk!

Comment on Adbrite Vs Adsense 1 Year by yuppie

yuppie — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 13:36:59 +0000

when it comes to cpc, there is no adsense alternative

Comment on Vampires Live Codes by Its_just_a_game

Its_just_a_game — Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:23:02 +0000

APF3CC

Comment on Cisco Xfinity RNG100 Cable Box by Russ

Russ — Sat, 14 Jan 2012 19:19:42 +0000

Oh I understand this all too well spent 3 hours trying to set up the cable box and three adapter’s yesterday then spent five hours with customer service who did nothing and the cable box still won’t work nor will the remote. My adapter on my tv skips a lot going to the service interupted error quite a lot.

Comment on Vampires Live Codes by hellokitty420

hellokitty420 — Sun, 08 Jan 2012 17:59:49 +0000

Clan Code: 5CDYFF

Comment on What is Google Sniper by I bought Bought Google Sniper

I bought Bought Google Sniper — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:36:23 +0000

I bought Google sniper and tried to get a refund. The run around was so frustrating I gave up and chalked it down as a loss.

They convince you to sign up for some news letter that is pointless, but costs you money every month. Complete uselessness.

The whole thing sells it’s self as a way to get your website noticed and these have to be the most elementary ineffective methods of getting your website into search engines.

Even Google sniper’s main website, can not be found in Google.

you can only find the #2 and it’s getting buried under.

So far, the only people to say his name, are the people defending it.

Comment on Is Google Sniper a Scam ? by Crisencio

Crisencio — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 12:27:41 +0000

It’s good I did not push through purchasing google sniper 2.0 because he’s claims are really too good to be true!

Comment on What Gaming Platforms Will See GTA V by Aziz

Aziz — Tue, 03 Jan 2012 09:47:35 +0000

PS4 is definiately the platform for CTA V.

Comment on What is Google Sniper by TruXter

TruXter — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:22:39 +0000

Yes, my site is built very basic.
It is a wordpress site and the theme is basic because it is one that allows me to place banners exactly where I need them. I use wordpress because it’s a “no effort” script. I can post from my cell phone using the wordpress ap for android. It’s really cool. Especially if i am writing a review on location and want to leave something in drafts area to get to when I get home. The theme looks basic because it is.

I am not selling SEO or webdesign from this site.

I build websites for other people, and put more attention into the designs I give them, because they are paying customers.
This website is just for blasting out news and reviews, and linking to actual products, like shirts, jackets and bumper stickers. There is nothing seedy about selling a bumper sticker.

I only review things I have tried. I have not tried everything in the world, or this website would be quite bulky by now.

Assuming that a person has not tried a product, is quite foolish, when you clearly have nothing to base this theory on.

Comment on What is Google Sniper by seminole

seminole — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 20:01:54 +0000

Dear Truxter,

Your comments about Geroge Brown’s google sniper are completely false. The system is not a scam, however, I do agree that some of the knowledge could be used by scammers.

You claim that you make 300 in ad revenue but you dont say over how long a period. Per month? Per day? Per year? Although ad revenue is easy money, especially f you have sites with high traffic, the big money is within affiliate programs. The problem here is that there are alot of seedy affiliate networks out there and it can be hard to find a legit one with good products (like clickbank). These seedy networks are the scammers.

You claim to be proficient in web/graphic design but this site is built on a elementary word press platform with possibly the most generic theme available. No offense but this site falls into the skillets of some 12 year olds. Also, you are doing the exact same thing by promoting products on your sites so how do you justify that? Do you really expect us to believe that you have tried every product? In addition, what makes your opinion on these products qualified especially since your website is very basic and doesn’t reflect someone who is an expert in web/graphic design or a tech savy individual?

Continuing on, I built ONE site that generated 500 a day on autopilot. Now it also importnat for me to note that I did have others sites that were complete failures. Internet marketing is tough, it requires effort, brains, and luck.

George Brown’s system gives you the knowledge to succeed at internet marketing. He shows testimonials of people who have made it big soley to market his product but that does not indicate that everyone can do it. This same marketing principle is applied to weight loss and various other products all of the time.

Comment on Is Google Sniper a Scam ? by TruXter

TruXter — Mon, 02 Jan 2012 01:58:50 +0000

Google will not advertise SEO related content, unless the company advertising, passes Google’s standards.
look at the ads over there. none of them say “hey, get rich quick while scamming”.

Comment on Is Google Sniper a Scam ? by NotaMoron

NotaMoron — Sun, 01 Jan 2012 19:11:23 +0000

The person who wrote this is a complete moron, 99% of everything on the internet is a scam.

The dumbest thing this guy said was ” if google advertises it, it has to be legit ”

Facebook, google, and other major sites all advertise scams, face it, you can’t trust nothing anymore on the internet. Even on tv they advertise scams like zoosk and quibids. It’s all about the money people don’t forget it

they all come down to lewer and hook scams. They offer something which you want meanwhile theyre the ones getting something from YOU, information, money, etc…

Comment on Tiny 7 Users – You need to know by TruXter

TruXter — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:14:56 +0000

Where the size matters.Is the bloatware that has been bundled since xp. Sure windows 95 had it’s compuserve or aol bundled, but that is dwarfed by just the amount or resources used to run one single widget on your computer in windows 7… I forget, is it called a widget? who cares.. I know you could do the same thing with 95/98/xp if you just made a desktop toolbar. Sure it was uglier, but the same.
There were many operations removed once dos was “demoted” to only CMD..
It’s the dumming down with bloated shiny useless features, being pawned off as new innovative ideas. Ideas that force you to buy better hardware for these features that no one used before anyway.
Don’t believe me?
This is a tiny 7 thread….
of course win 95 won’t run a six processor. They didn’t exist. What’s missing?
The operating system ran on 200mb processors and less. Less than 100mb ram. That’s the part where size matters. There is no bloated candy buttons.
In many industries, there are hobbyists, who actually begin a career of doing what is called a “retro-fit”. putting a ford 351 Cleveland in a 1982 mazda rx7. etc.
Sometimes you just have to ask “what can be done to get what I want?”
Now, I don’t claim to be anything more than a hobbyist. Someone who hate patches. and updates because every now and again, you lose functions. I used progman all the way till xp patch 2 came out disabled program manager. I used to boot to progman with a registry edit, disabling explorer.exe, just so I could preserve my resources. remember black viper’s boot tweak? Was golden.
This is the same reason why I tried tiny 7. To save resources.

Sure. Dos focused operating systems were clunky. Look how fast/super slow the processors were back then.

Comment on Tiny 7 Users – You need to know by Fraud

Fraud — Fri, 30 Dec 2011 12:07:13 +0000

“I just have to wonder what a 128 mb operating system would feel like on an 8 core machine.”

Other than the fact that size has no bearing on how fast an OS is other than boot time and only in certain situations (eg. increasing CPU speed on Windows kernel 6.x.xx leads to faster boot times than increasing storage I/O) Windows 95 and any DOS based program cannot do SMP processing. In other words it would only be able to use 1 core no matter what.

Granted that 1 core it would run on with todays CPU is many times more powerful than anything from the Win95 era.