<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taste Of Cool (cuil search engine)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://truxtertech.com/news/2008/08/01/taste-of-cool-cuil-search-engine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://truxtertech.com/news/2008/08/01/taste-of-cool-cuil-search-engine/</link>
	<description>Tech News,Video game, Computer, upgrade</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 09:22:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: gsmorrison</title>
		<link>http://truxtertech.com/news/2008/08/01/taste-of-cool-cuil-search-engine/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>gsmorrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://truxtertech.com/news/?p=185#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Hiya TruXter.  

I have to agree on the over all look of Cuil. The interface and the way Cuil displays the results is really quite fresh &amp; new.

The way the search suggestions work do a fairly good job narrowing content as well.

The only problem, as you&#039;ve stated, are the results themselves. The results are often jumbled in a seemingly incorrect order. Or, the first page of hits will contain redundant or outdated material. This is not always a bad thing though! It depends on what kind of search you are performing.

I actually like the way Cuil works......Not like Google. 

In reality, if I were searching for the current events, I would use Google, hands down.

However, if I wanted to find out obscure information and at the same time be entertained by the interface and the sheer &#039;roll of the dice&#039; factor....It may be Cuil.

This is what might make Cuil become the &#039;extra&#039; browser of choice by Google users. Although unlikely (I hope) to become the Google killer, it really has the potential to evolve into the &#039;little brother&#039; to Google.

That is a good thing for them IMHO. Being second choice to Google in the Browser Wars is a great thing for Cuil &amp; users alike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiya TruXter.  </p>
<p>I have to agree on the over all look of Cuil. The interface and the way Cuil displays the results is really quite fresh &amp; new.</p>
<p>The way the search suggestions work do a fairly good job narrowing content as well.</p>
<p>The only problem, as you&#8217;ve stated, are the results themselves. The results are often jumbled in a seemingly incorrect order. Or, the first page of hits will contain redundant or outdated material. This is not always a bad thing though! It depends on what kind of search you are performing.</p>
<p>I actually like the way Cuil works&#8230;&#8230;Not like Google. </p>
<p>In reality, if I were searching for the current events, I would use Google, hands down.</p>
<p>However, if I wanted to find out obscure information and at the same time be entertained by the interface and the sheer &#8216;roll of the dice&#8217; factor&#8230;.It may be Cuil.</p>
<p>This is what might make Cuil become the &#8216;extra&#8217; browser of choice by Google users. Although unlikely (I hope) to become the Google killer, it really has the potential to evolve into the &#8216;little brother&#8217; to Google.</p>
<p>That is a good thing for them IMHO. Being second choice to Google in the Browser Wars is a great thing for Cuil &amp; users alike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

