Tag: science

What the Future will Say about Today’s Technology

Posted onAuthorTips Of Tech

As we find that theories change due to altering factors, we may find one day that these things that work today, may be so archaic in the future the people in the future will have no idea how we made this old junk actually function, or could wonder why we even bothered with such self destructive uselessness.

“They carried little radioactive devices in their pocket as a status of wealth and importance, but justified the expensive costs with a need to communicate RIGHT NOW?”.

I worry about the credibility one could hold if they go on record saying that some past theory is worthless because of some new findings. In most cases the new findings are based on findings that started from the original stated theory. In the future when it is explained would ruin the credibility of the current scientists.

Yes the past means old ways, but you wouldn’t have your current knowledge if it wasn’t based on original theories. Meaning a 25 year old theory isn’t wrong just because of new findings, Those new findings are just different outcomes and new circumstances that you might be looking at from some made up rules that you are pulling from another test. Yes, sometimes logic and rational knowledge would lead you to believe both have the same rules or one is the standard of rules of the other, but you can’t 100% verify that your previous finding is 100% the only outcome, but if you look at them both under the same rules you have a definable answer, until someone has the time to try a different but similar test with differing rules to get a whole different outcome. You can then come to acknowledge a whole new standard in science. Main factor is time, altering factor is funds. Your results are based on your funds, and your time to invest in the study.

200-2000 years from now, everything you think is the be all end all rule, will most likely be taught in the lowest grade of education and might be passed off as disoriented mythology.

Look back just 25 years ago. The people of that time dreamed of computers that were not even 1/100th the processing power of today’s computers. And those people thought that type of “futuristic” computer could power a flying car and solve diseases (much like what is proposed to be the purpose of tumbling), work artificial intelligence robots. We now know better. It will never work with that type of power. but at that time, the most intelligent minds of that era considered it possible. Can you truly think that 200 years from now, what our current highest held Scientific finding, will even be a drop in the bucket of ideas and logic?

One day or over a bit of time, some one (one representing thousands) will stand up and say “Oh heck, they have been looking at this completely wrong, all of that is useless”. And suddenly some weird or overlooked factor is brought into the picture and all previous findings are dismissed for a true result that proves 100% correctness from that point forward.

Is There Life on Other Planets?

Posted onAuthorGame News

We are the life on other planets.

What does that mean. Well you have to think in theory. There really is not much to base this theory on other than it’s something else that can not be dismissed and proved wrong, except by another theory.

Our solar system has  what is seen as 8 planets. Two of these planets are ” just gas” . I have to say … prove it. Go there and bring me proof. Otherwise you are just standing outside looking in, and all you are saying is just theory. No matter how great your certainty in a hypothesis, it is still just a theory. To dismiss another theory because you have convinced yourself of another is just plain ignorance. how long did man think the earth was flat ?

With that said let’s move on to the topic, and use the theory that Jupiter and Saturn are gas.

I may have heard this elsewhere, I am not sure but ……

Let’s say man did not originate here on Earth. Let’s say that every 6000 years the Sun gobbles up a planet, and every planet in the solar system is actually drifting inward toward the sun, instead of drifting away from the sun. Let’s suggest that there are two gas planets and one planet that is mostly gas that is evolving into another planet much similar to the earth.

Just in a pondering moment, what is the likelihood that we as humans jump ship every 5ooo-7000 years? What this would mean, is no there never was life on mars, but there will be. We will be on mars. As the earth gets closer to being gobbled up by the sun, we jump on a rocket  and get our stinky butts to some place new.

Question of that would be ” why did they not leave this message for us as they dropped us off here??”  We can consider that during the time we got dropped off here and where getting comfortable, the previous planet Venus was still alive and thriving, but near it’s point of breaking. Due to the greenhouse effect on Venus and high temperatures lack of oxygen mass presence of Carbon, and nasty smoggy looking atmosphere, I bet I know why that planet died early.  We got dropped here and left stupid, because the elder ones ( lol yeah I said that) that dropped us here did not want us to do what they did, because it looks like it might be longer before we get a new planet than what they had for them. I bet that the planet’s existences and habitability periods overlapped, they checked in on us from time to time to make sure we found the right foods and that our weather was calm and nice enough in the locations they dropped us. Explains some of the Egyptian and Mayan Hieroglyphs. and how they got the same build designs so far apart, at roughly the same time and era.

In a few hundred years I bet we see strange activity from jupiter and see it compress what is it’s atmosphere and see it become closer to Mars’s atmosphere, revealing a newly formed planet, with a greater amount of water than what is on earth, just waiting for us to skip Mars and jump in. Right after that Mercury will dissapear into the sun and soon after that, a new planet will begin at the end of the line. Scary thing is, if Mars is a blooper and we have to skip it then we might not make the shift smooth enough to the next planet due to the fact that we are off by one planet.

This goofy theory would be hard to sell to NASA or any other space program to start a livable Mars project. To deeper explain that, If there is a bit of a time strain waiting for the Jupiter to form water, livable temperatures, Oxygen and trees and food and plants and animals, then the smart thing to do is start Oxygenating Mars. Scatter a mess load of seeds on  Mars. Get a fungus growing, get some grass growing, get this ball rolling. If it turns out this theory is wrong about the sun gobbeling planets up, well the end result is we have two freakin planets.